5 ms·
You've really gone off the deep end now. At least you've completely contradicted your "progressive" defense earlier, and now it is transparent that you have ant
by oinksoft 13y ago
You've really gone off the deep end now. At least you've completely contradicted your "progressive" defense earlier, and now it is transparent that you have antiquated views about very strong gender roles.
So, isn't that dishonest to laugh at me that I believe in
natural sex roles in the society when you obviously do
believe in them as well?
Seeing that I haven't stated any of my own views, other than that I find yours very distasteful, I've got a hunch we agree on very few things about this.
And you seem to be fine with that natural.
You seem to have a problem only and only when female sex is at
disadvantage.
So, isn't that dishonest to laugh at me that I believe in natural sex
roles in the society when you obviously do believe in them as well?
Don't use me as your straw man, please.
- LekkoscPiwa 13y ago>Don't use me as your straw man, please. Well, I'm sorry, but you should have stated where you stand on the issues instead of worrying about semantics. Not to mention first patronizing me and now victimizing yourself. Would you be in favor of a law requiring that the half of all the divorce cases must end with the kids staying with the father?