I find that very interesting actually, because that would be a very low price to pay: about the price of a lunch for one year of service, while Facebook hosts t

I find that very interesting actually, because that would be a very low price to pay: about the price of a lunch for one year of service, while Facebook hosts tons of pictures and videos and manage your events, etc. They definitely offer a valuable service to millions of people but it seems that social networks are not allowed to charge their users. It's definitely taboo and would be criticized to no end. I can see my news stream filled with "Soandso joined the group 'Paying for Facebook? WTF?'". I'm sure that, for many people, Facebook feels trivial to do even though they put in place a very reliable and fast infrastructure that handles a ridiculous amount of data.