4 ms·
Quite frankly, I despise the use of "SEO URLs" altogether. It's basically a waste of bytes.
by tsahyt 13y ago
Quite frankly, I despise the use of "SEO URLs" altogether. It's basically a waste of bytes.
- davedx 13y agoNot if you view SEO as genuinely helping search engines to find content in a way that improves the discoverability of web pages. If it's purely to boost rankings artificially, then yes, I agree.
- nkozyra 13y agoSometimes, sometimes not. You can often compress a lot of ¶meter=value into a simple /value/ rewrite. This - by most accounts - makes it more SEO friendly. Granted, putting full sentences that match an article title is never necessary, but there are a lot of SEO tricks that can make a url not only "nicer" looking but also shorter.
- jeffasinger 13y agoSome of the best SEO URLs also tend to be human guessable URLs, which is definitely not a waste of bytes.