3 ms·
Worth clarifying: I'm not saying you should ignore the issue of balance, I'm just saying you should ignore the issue of "sexism in technology". Making efforts
by swombat 14y ago
Worth clarifying: I'm not saying you should ignore the issue of balance, I'm just saying you should ignore the issue of "sexism in technology".
Making efforts to hire a team with some male-female balance is just as worthwhile as making efforts to hire a team that's balanced long other criteria. No one wants to work for an all-male company, just as no one wants to work for an all-female company. There's not even really a need to look at the market opportunities side of things. Balance is just more comfortable for everyone.
If you're creating a company and planning you're hiring, and you're not a jerk, you probably are worried about keeping some kind of balance.
- shantanubala 14y agoYup, I was agreeing with you -- I probably should've made it clearer. I just wanted to point out that people sometimes confuse "sexism" and "imbalance" -- a poor gender ratio doesn't imply sexism, and a good ratio doesn't get rid of sexism.
- subsystem 14y ago"[...] and a good ratio doesn't get rid of sexism" I'm not so sure, I think diversity in general takes away a lot of lazy discriminatory behavior in the long run.