2 ms·
The article's font sample image is pretty shoddy. They've resized it and so lost all the features of the renderer! To my eyes, the top example seems clearer and
by joosters 14y ago
The article's font sample image is pretty shoddy. They've resized it and so lost all the features of the renderer! To my eyes, the top example seems clearer and sharper than the bottom one.
The original image is found at http://google-opensource.blogspot.com.au/2013/05/got-cff.html http://google-opensource.blogspot.com.au/2013/05/got-cff.htm... and is much better.
- mpyne 14y agoI'm glad you linked that because the second example, not shown at the ZDNet article, is actually a much better demonstration of improvement IMO.
- xfs 14y agoAdobe's post http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/2013/05/adobe-contributes-cff-rasterizer-to-freetype.html http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/2013/05/adobe-contribute...
- sp332 14y agoThe "responsive" design of the page might shrink the image down if your window is too narrow. Here's a direct link to the image on the page: http://cdn-static.zdnet.com/i/r/story/70/00/014803/freetype-cff-601x443.png?hash=ZwV4AmSvMz&upscale=1 http://cdn-static.zdnet.com/i/r/story/70/00/014803/freetype-... which looks fine, I think.