3 ms·
My point isn't about specific legal "switch statements" (to use programming terminology). It's about the fact that the _principle_ of free speech is being activ
by javert 14y ago
My point isn't about specific legal "switch statements" (to use programming terminology). It's about the fact that the _principle_ of free speech is being actively attacked in this country.
I'm quite surprised that, as a brother/sister comment to this one pointed out, a law such as the one you described actually did (does?) exist.
- wpietri 14y agoI think the other poster is wrong. Also, I think you don't understand free speech. The reason democracies are universally big on free speech is that the citizenry must be able to freely discuss how to run their country. You appear to be a free-speech fundamentalist. Which is an opinion you're entitled to hold. But personally, I strongly disagree that free speech should privilege those spending millions or billions manipulating the opinion of the voters, especially when that's an attempt to line their own pockets. If any Fortune 500 CEO would like to stand on the streetcorner and explain his views on an issue, I believe no law should stop him. But I believe the current system is just a fancy form of corruption, and does significant harm to the goals that led to the adoption of the first amendment.