4 ms·
How can I see if the issue[1] that caused GitHub tons of issue[2] was fixed on this RC? [1] https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/9813 https://github.com/rails
by DanielRibeiro 14y ago
How can I see if the issue[1] that caused GitHub tons of issue[2] was fixed on this RC?
[1] https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/9813 https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/9813
[2] https://github.com/blog/1440-today-s-email-incident https://github.com/blog/1440-today-s-email-incident
- steveklabnik 14y agoHere's how, normally: 1) You take the commit referenced, like this: https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/f980289fd2c1b9073a94b5d49b780a49f5e2933c https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/f980289fd2c1b9073a94b5... 2) Right below the title, GitHub shows you which branches the commit is in. As you can see with that commit (the one that caused the problem), it's only in 3-2-stable. Therefore, not being in master, it wasn't ever in Rails 4, only in Rails 3.2. Since this was a security issue, it's possible that the commit was different for Rails 4. So we load up the page for the referenced CVE (cve-2013-1854): http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2013-1854 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2013-1854 That page links to the announcement email: https://groups.google.com/group/ruby-security-ann/msg/34e0d780b04308de?dmode=source&output=gplain https://groups.google.com/group/ruby-security-ann/msg/34e0d7... The announcement email discusses which versions were affected: > Versions Affected: 3.2.x, 3.1.x, 2.3.x But, since Rails 4 wasn't yet released, it wouldn't be there. To be 100% sure, you can grab a copy of the source, and grep the git log for the CVE number. That brings up this commit: https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/2392535f4085d88186097e3c23414e958fb1d16d https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/2392535f4085d88186097e... This commit is in master and v4.0.0rc1, as GitHub shows. I am not mega super updated on the status of this issue, as I'm not on the security team, but given that it's still open and marked as 'regression,' I would not be sure that this was fixed. That said, this particular bug is a complex interaction between components, and people haven't mentioned if it affects master or not. Therefore it's possible that even though the fix didn't make it into 3-2-stable yet, it may not have affected master. So, at the end of all that, I guess the answer is "I'm not 100% sure, I'd ping tenderlove," but I hope that helps you identify which commits have made it into which releases in the future.
- DanielRibeiro 14y agoThanks Steven! I'll look into it. And thanks for all the great work you've been putting on Rails.
- steveklabnik 14y ago<3