OpenBSD's documentation needs some work once you get into less well-traveled aspects of pf and routing. For instance, getting reliable external interface load b

OpenBSD's documentation needs some work once you get into less well-traveled aspects of pf and routing. For instance, getting reliable external interface load balancing to work is maddening. (The example at the bottom of http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html does not work and is not the best approach.) Other than a few esoteric situations like that one though, I agree: OpenBSD's documentation is pretty darn good. I like them primarily because they're sitting in a corner quietly doing their own thing, and their own thing happens to be a very stable & very reliable network service operating system with an emphasis on security and performance. It's a refreshing change from the ADHD present in the development communities of other operating systems.