3 ms·
> 3. The HTML on the page is very simple, but malformed -- perhaps look for pages like that (some missing </p> tags) The w3.org validator says it's okay. http
by ggchappell 14y ago
> 3. The HTML on the page is very simple, but malformed -- perhaps look for pages like that (some missing </p> tags)
The w3.org validator says it's okay.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A//voidnull.sdf.org/ http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A//voidnull.sdf.org/
- loumf 14y agoThat might be so, but it's still a possibly identifying fingerprint.
- btilly 14y agoSorry, but only people who have never written HTML by hand could think that omitted </p> tags are a useful identifying fingerprint. It can fit in with word choice, indentation, line length, etc as part of a personal pattern. But by itself it is as meaningful as saying "and".
- cocoflunchy 14y agoI have 4 errors, 5 warnings...
- ggchappell 14y agoSo, do I, now. But it's the ISP's over-quote page, not the page originally posted.
- cocoflunchy 14y agoOk, my bad.