5 ms·
I honestly can't find the source of this, but I recall reading that Turing was against mnemonic assemblers (as they would consume scarce resources). Its unders
by scj 13y ago
I honestly can't find the source of this, but I recall reading that Turing was against mnemonic assemblers (as they would consume scarce resources).
Its understandable given the computers of the time. But I suspect that at some point, you'll probably want to talk about quality, which so many programmers have discussed.
David Parnas would be a more suitable candidate, if you really want to name it after someone. But I'd like to point out that you may not want to name the oath after a person unless they are involved in drafting it.
Dijkstra, for example, spoke frequently on the topic of being ethical as a programmer / professor. Out of respect, I would never name something like this after him unless I could back up every word with his various papers.
- darxius 13y agoGood point, the oath could just not be named after someone. There's a github issue opened for discussing the name change.