I'm not so sure the VideoEgg's frame is 'evil' like DiggBar's frame. It looks to me as if the ad is inserted into the current DOM at runtime and thus the URL fo

I'm not so sure the VideoEgg's frame is 'evil' like DiggBar's frame. It looks to me as if the ad is inserted into the current DOM at runtime and thus the URL for every page using the technology isn't a VideoEgg URL (could you imagine if an ad company told their customers that, from now on, their pages would be served-up with the ad company's URL?). If it doesn't take over the URL and is just nodes dynamically inserted into the DOM at runtime, then no harm done, right?