2 ms·

Here are my analyses: When somebody hacks into one's computer, he can't do any physical harm, he sure can steal money, spy on the victim, but he can't make the

Here are my analyses: When somebody hacks into one's computer, he can't do any physical harm, he sure can steal money, spy on the victim, but he can't make the computer burn or somehow harm the victim. The computers that can be used for doing real damage (i.e. bomb activation, drone command and control centre, etc.) are well protected from the hackers (not connected to the internet and physicall inaccessable). Controrary to this, the self-driving cars are potentially dangerous and will be widely accessable and hackable, I see this as a real problem. We should not allow a computer to do things that can kill people, and a computer-driven car can kill people.

shreyansj 13y ago
> We should not allow a computer to do things that can kill people Should we not allow computers (auto-pilot) to fly airplanes?
- conductor 13y ago
  Though your example is not the best (pilots are still there and can disable the auto-pilot and drive in the manual mode) I will correct myself: I think we should now allow computers, which can be easily accessed and potentially altered/hacked, to do things that can kill people.
  - piyush_soni 13y ago
    The thing is, computers as of today are dangerous enough already, and depending on which ones you hack can cause enough destruction as of today. So of course, security is important for all of them and I'm sure Google's self-driving car will do something to be as secure as they can.
  - freebullets 13y ago
    >pilots are still there and can disable the auto-pilot If the computer decides to allow the pilot to do that.
  - nwh 13y ago
    Most Boeing 747 craft run a very old, unpatched version of Solaris. Someone with user access could almost certainly crash a plane using that. The same holds true for a lot of consumer goods running embedded linux. Even my damn TV has vulnerabilities.
signed0 13y ago
While we're at it, we should probably prevent people from doing things that can kill people.
ceejayoz 13y ago
> We should not allow a computer to do things that can kill people, and a computer-driven car can kill people. Your car's computer already has control of throttle, brakes, door locks, etc.

shreyansj 13y ago

> We should not allow a computer to do things that can kill people Should we not allow computers (auto-pilot) to fly airplanes?

conductor 13y ago
Though your example is not the best (pilots are still there and can disable the auto-pilot and drive in the manual mode) I will correct myself: I think we should now allow computers, which can be easily accessed and potentially altered/hacked, to do things that can kill people.
- piyush_soni 13y ago
  The thing is, computers as of today are dangerous enough already, and depending on which ones you hack can cause enough destruction as of today. So of course, security is important for all of them and I'm sure Google's self-driving car will do something to be as secure as they can.
- freebullets 13y ago
  >pilots are still there and can disable the auto-pilot If the computer decides to allow the pilot to do that.
- nwh 13y ago
  Most Boeing 747 craft run a very old, unpatched version of Solaris. Someone with user access could almost certainly crash a plane using that. The same holds true for a lot of consumer goods running embedded linux. Even my damn TV has vulnerabilities.

signed0 13y ago

While we're at it, we should probably prevent people from doing things that can kill people.

ceejayoz 13y ago

> We should not allow a computer to do things that can kill people, and a computer-driven car can kill people. Your car's computer already has control of throttle, brakes, door locks, etc.