4 ms·
Disqus Gravity — The web of discussions
- ssewani 13y agothis looks cool, what's the technology behind it?
- Articulate 13y agoAm I missing something- I like that the blogs are in circles- kind of fun but does it help me find blogs I wouldn't find otherwise?
- vincelane 13y agoHey, thanks for the feedback! I'm the lead designer on this project. Gravity probably won't replace Google Reader just yet. Out goal was to create a fun experience, show off a little bit of our network, and listen to feedback – feedback that we might use to drive the design and features of potential future Disqus products.
- NikolaTesla 13y agoThis is very different than most of the stuff I've seen using d3. Do you have plans to "disqus" how it was done?
- nthitz 13y agoLooks like it's using some of the Force Layout stuff https://github.com/mbostock/d3/wiki/Force-Layout https://github.com/mbostock/d3/wiki/Force-Layout
- hwang0214 13y agoreally awesome design. maybe use more images in the bubbles instead of text to get more clicks?
- eksith 13y agoThis kinda reminds me Tom Groves' "Corkboard" idea (except these are topic bubbles, and Tom actually created floating topic "Post-its") http://web.archive.org/web/20040725085305/http://www.tomgroves.net/corkboard/ http://web.archive.org/web/20040725085305/http://www.tomgrov...
- r00fus 13y agoThis reminds me of Altavista search back in 1999 (it would string together words that were connected, creating a web - exciting stuff back then). Except I can't figure out how Gravity would be useful at all. I can't, for example expand the "tech" section.
- csmatt 13y agoLooks like future versions will include an easter egg!
- vincelane 13y agoShhh! ;-)
- resu 13y agoSome of the text in the smaller bubbles are illegible. Also, is it possible to prevent the collision of a few bubbles from causing everything on the screen to move? Very impressive!
- li-ch 13y agoToo little information, too much cognitive overhead.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- al1x 13y agoWhat am I supposed to be doing with it? What am I supposed to be getting from it? Admiring some design work or absorbing useful information? The aesthetic is there, but the utility? Nonexistent. This isn't how you present this type of data to a consumer. It isn't consumption-friendly.