5 ms·
How chauvinist is this reply. I would not have thought to see such a thing on HN.
by Uchikoma 13y ago
How chauvinist is this reply. I would not have thought to see such a thing on HN.
- TheCoelacanth 13y agoI don't see how it's chauvinist to suggest that a "country" with no human inhabitants except for foreign military personnel doesn't need its own ccTLD.
- Oxxide 13y agothat's because it isn't.
- Uchikoma 13y agoIt is. Removing natives, stealing their land, then declaring there is no population so you also get their TLD is chauvinist.
- Uchikoma 13y agoSo when I remove you forcibly from your land (which the inhabitants were by the British government), then I steal your land and later I declare there is "no general population" so you have no right to a TLD either, it is not chauvinist when I declare you non existent? Because you were native and could not defend yourself against a modern army?
- Uchikoma 13y ago"On 11 May 2006, the High Court ruled that a 2004 Order in Council preventing the Chagossians' resettlement of the islands was unlawful, and consequently that the Chagossians were entitled to return to the outer islands of the Chagos Archipelago. [...] According to a WikiLeaks disclosure document, in a calculated move in 2009 to prevent re-settlement of the BIOT by native Chagossians, the UK proposed that the BIOT become a "marine reserve" with the aim of preventing the former inhabitants from returning to their lands. " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Indian_Ocean_Territory http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Indian_Ocean_Territory
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]