4 ms·
I read yesterday that more people in India have access to a cell phone than to a toilet or running water. I assume they are very poor since they have to poop ou
by 16s 13y ago
I read yesterday that more people in India have access to a cell phone than to a toilet or running water. I assume they are very poor since they have to poop outside on the street, but they do have cell phones.
- Someone 13y agoEven then, 40% of _households_ does not have a phone (http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/indian-toilet-scheme-wins-geneva-global-innovation-award-article-1.1180696 http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/indian-toilet-s...). That is in line with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_mobile_phones_in_use http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_..., which states there are about 2 mobile phones for every 3 Indians. I think it is safe to bet that, among those using public transport, mobile phone ownership will not be higher. Also, of those with a mobile on those buses, mobile phone _usage_, likely, will be higher for the richer ones.
- delinka 13y ago"Access to" and "owning it oneself" are not necessarily equivalent. If a household of seven has a single cell phone, seven people have "access to" a cell phone.
- Zigurd 13y agoMobile phones and internet access via mobile phones is a pretty high priority, even if the other items on the list are a toilet, a scooter, or a stove. The rationale is that the phone and internet enables you to earn more and get the other items.