4 ms·

Source ?

• ekianjo 14y ago
  Ah that was not Liberation, but inrocks instead... but I may have read something similar in the Liberation since they are so very much in the same line of thought: http://www.lesinrocks.com/2010/09/26/actualite/ils-ont-decide-de-ne-plus-travailler-1125542/ http://www.lesinrocks.com/2010/09/26/actualite/ils-ont-decid... For English speakers out there, the title means "they decided not to work anymore" That's what you get for giving out welfare without setting any expectations to the person who gets it: people abusing the system.
  • conradfr 14y ago
    Thanks. I don't think that article glorified anything though.
    • ekianjo 14y ago
      Well, when 95% of the article supports one idea and only the last 10 lines mention the potential issues with it, I call that very biased at the least.
      • rguillebert 14y ago
        The article says they can't afford proper food and have no social life...
        • tpainton 14y ago
          That's because they can't find jobs or they chose not to work. Either way, who's to blame for this? Surely not the hard working wealthy. Oh wait....
          • ekianjo 14y ago
            It's more like they choose not work, most of the time, and live off society.