4 ms·
"I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone (who's not directly involved in something horrible - father of a murdered child, etc) that disagrees with getting
by betterunix 14y ago
"I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone (who's not directly involved in something horrible - father of a murdered child, etc) that disagrees with getting a fair trial."
I am pretty sure your local district attorney would disagree. The majority of prisoners in America -- the overwhelming majority -- did not have a trial and took a plea deal instead. A standard prosecutor tactic is to make the list of charges as long and extensive as possible, to pressure the defendant into a guilty plea. It has been suggested that if everyone were to refuse a plea deal and demand a jury trial, the justice system would be completely overwhelmed and unable to handle the load.
"For example, i'm a big fan of red light cameras. I hate them, but the blind uniform enforcement is great. Doesn't matter if you're a cop, or an important business man, or late for school. You break the law, you pay your ticket and move on."
I had not thought of that, but it is a perfect example of why we do not want law enforcement to become too efficient:
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/life/shorter-yellow-lights-mean-more-red-light-revenue http://www.marketplace.org/topics/life/shorter-yellow-lights...
- jfoutz 14y agoIs the district attorney's opinion because of your strategy to make everything expensive? We build other systems that are very complex, explicit and efficient. Less prosecutor discretion, and more adaptive law seems better than making trial costs spiral out of control. Yes, and yellow light timing isn't contentious at all, is it? It's almost like perfect enforcement of stupid laws gets those laws modified to not be stupid. But whatever, i'm sure your way is good too.