> However, the minute a powerful person decides to "pick up a phone" and make someone unfundable or unemployable, the targeted person has the right to destroy t

> However, the minute a powerful person decides to "pick up a phone" and make someone unfundable or unemployable, the targeted person has the right to destroy that adversary (through exposure, or violently, up to killing) and is doing a heroic and hygienic act if he does. Do you mean that the solution is making your own justice? Moral considerations aside, do you REALLY think that this way the system would be more fair?