3 ms·
Ubuntu 11.10 was Oneiric Ocelot, so Apple might not want to muddy the waters there.
by shrikant 14y ago
Ubuntu 11.10 was Oneiric Ocelot, so Apple might not want to muddy the waters there.
- sjtgraham 14y agoI really think Apple couldn't care less about that, e.g. Cisco IOS.
- shrikant 14y agoThey didn't just ride rough-shod over an existing trademark, and in fact licensed it from Cisco. [I'm aware that Ubuntu release code-names are probably not trademarked since they don't refer to the official release of the OS. Still, reusing another codename that's popular public knowledge in the tech community? That would not be cool.]
- sjtgraham 14y agoClearly Apple licensed it from Cisco, I didn't claim otherwise. My point is Apple does not care about naming collisions with existing products in the market place, which you haven't addressed.