3 ms·
> And just because we cannot measure its success rate using mathematics or statistics - that doesn't mean it is not a valid tool. Wrong. It means exactly that.
by brazzy 14y ago
> And just because we cannot measure its success rate using mathematics or statistics - that doesn't mean it is not a valid tool.
Wrong. It means exactly that.
- bnegreve 14y agoUsually when something is not statistically relevant you can also prove it. I am not sure how you would do it in this case. It probably works to some limited extents: for example, I am sure they can guess rather accurately whether the candidate is male or female. So I do see a difference between a non valid tool and a tool whose efficiency is hard to evaluate. Now, don't get me wrong, I wouldn't use graphology.