Neurocriminology is disturbing when you think about the ramifications. The science and experimental data keeps getting better, the supporting evidence keeps imp

Neurocriminology is disturbing when you think about the ramifications. The science and experimental data keeps getting better, the supporting evidence keeps improving, and the findings have become the proverbial elephant in the room. The science doesn't bother me, but the implications are just frightening. For example, in the stated case of Donta Page where the testimony of neurocriminology experts was used to avoid a death penalty sentence, the opposite is just as feasible; neurocriminology could be used to support a death penalty sentence, just as it would have supported denying parole on his previous incarceration for robbery. It would be a massive change of our justice system from punishments matching crimes, to punishments matching both crimes and criminals.