3 ms·
> In my opinion, stuff that someone has made should probably be considered the most important thing by miles. It doesn't have to be open-source code, but that c
by jiggy2011 14y ago
> In my opinion, stuff that someone has made should probably be considered the most important thing by miles. It doesn't have to be open-source code, but that certainly helps.
Problem is, a lot of good engineers (especially at big companies) may have spent a lot of time working on something that wasn't very important or good. They may have been a sparkling diamond in a sea of mediocrity.
One of my first jobs I spent the best part of a year working on something pretty dumb that was mired in bureaucracy and most people considered a bad idea from the start.
Yet that is what I worked on for around a year because that was where I was assigned, and it was considered important by edict of a person who earned approx 1000x my salary.
They eventually scrapped the project altogether.
- LockeWatts 14y agoWhy not make it an either or type of thing. "Would you rather solve an algorithm based question, or discuss some work you've done in the past that demonstrates that aptitude?"
- Evbn 14y agoBecause I don't know how to judge past work in your niche. My niche is different.
- mikro2nd 14y agoOr,... the stuff I built in the first 10 or so years of my career is classified. I'd have to kill you if you saw it. Some of it was pretty cool stuff, though.