3 ms·
Seriously, that seems like one of the worst naming decisions I've ever seen. It's not just that 'Fuse' is a common word - FUSE is an incredibly important projec
by chimeracoder 14y ago
Seriously, that seems like one of the worst naming decisions I've ever seen. It's not just that 'Fuse' is a common word - FUSE is an incredibly important project in the Linux world. This snafu is right up there with Unity[0], Unity[1] and Unity[2].
I really want to know what they were thinking - were they somehow unaware of the FUSE module?
[0](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unity_Linux http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unity_Linux)
[1](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_in_Userspace http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_in_Userspace)
[2](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unity_(game_engine) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unity_(game_engine))
- cjh_ 14y agoshouldnt [1] instead be http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unity_(user_interface) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unity_(user_interface) ?