4 ms·
That info is in the "More Details" section. With that said, do you still think it should go in the main table? Was trying to keep it from being too cluttered.
by austinhallock 13y ago
That info is in the "More Details" section. With that said, do you still think it should go in the main table? Was trying to keep it from being too cluttered.
- wwweston 13y agoIt might be good to include brief license information in the cost column -- for example: "free (MIT)". There's probably at least vertical space in the column for that along with a price, and it's conceptually related, particularly for licenses that carry responsibilties with them.
- austinhallock 13y agoAdded :)
- nickzoic 13y agoNifty. Since you're here, can I suggest that you work out a way to differentiate between "0 stars" and "unreviewed"?
- austinhallock 13y agoDone
- beefsack 13y agoI can't speak on behalf of everyone, but the license it's under is a deciding factor for me when looking at engines and libraries. It's definitely something I'd love to see at a first glance. Awesome site by the way!