2 ms·
Not sure I'm following you... the article talks about how the US can switch to wind and solar energy (as well as biofuel for the lulls on non-windy, cloudy days
by ph0rque 18y ago
Not sure I'm following you... the article talks about how the US can switch to wind and solar energy (as well as biofuel for the lulls on non-windy, cloudy days) and meet 100% of our energy demands that way. So yes, the author is advocating solving our problems with sun and wind instead of coal, natural gas, and radioactive material.
If done right, this will be rather transparent to you, the end user[1], it will reduce our dependence on non-renewable fuels, and create jobs in the process. You will still be able to plug in your TV to the wall and have it work.
1. Except perhaps for the price...
- RobertL 18y agoThe Naib is a babbling idiot. What you and he need to do is "start" local and grow from there. This means installing wind and solar generators at your own homes and cutting yourselves off from the power grid. I think that living like this for a few days and paying the bills you would be paying to live like that is probably the only thing that will finally convince you that the ideas presented here are total nonsense.