> His keynotes or videos may be very popular but they do not add to notability unless they get reported in the media. > These sources are not notable themselve

> His keynotes or videos may be very popular but they do not add to notability unless they get reported in the media. > These sources are not notable themselves. > Magazine with editor? Good. But merely saying "it is notable" is not enough. But merely saying "it is not notable" is enough, right? > The article is about Clojure and adds little to Hickey's notability. > No different. No coverage of person = no article. Fun quotes. I love watching editors twist rules to match their own interpretations even after being clearly refuted time and time again, as well as clearly violating the very rules that they refer to. Wikipedia editing has apparently devolved into politics for the sake of politics.