3 ms·
Oh no no, I completely understand how it could "not sit well" with someone, I over-simplified it for the audience and it was only supposed to be illustrative in
by oliyoung 13y ago
Oh no no, I completely understand how it could "not sit well" with someone, I over-simplified it for the audience and it was only supposed to be illustrative in the purpose of what I was writing.
(Obviously I'm more a believer/subscriber/fan of cognitive approaches to psychology, and why I wanted to be a psychologist and not a psychiatrist.)
- hollerith 13y agoI suggest ignoring experiment0's comments in this thread. At any rate, your article has convinced me that you're not just engaging in self-fulfilling prophecies or theorizing as he seems to imply when he writes "psychosomatic". (And experiment0, you can't have gotten far in your study of neuroscience if you think there are just 3 neurotransmitters.)
- experiment0 13y agoWhy would you suggest to ignore me when I was aiming to promote discussion. I was primarily questioning the science behind the post as there's a lot of questionable reporting on topics like these and so if it looks dubious, then I'm set to promote clarification. As it turns out oliyoung does seem to know what he's talking about, so I guess I needn't have worried. And the snark at the bottom of your reply is really quite unnecessary.
- baby 13y agoI suggest ignoring hollerith's comments in this thread. things got so meta...