4 ms·

I personally think foobar2000's fairly excellent. Flexible as hell, both in UI and in functionality. Quick and doesn't feel bulky at all. It's honestly the piec

I personally think foobar2000's fairly excellent. Flexible as hell, both in UI and in functionality. Quick and doesn't feel bulky at all. It's honestly the piece of software I miss most when I'm on my Linux install.

w1ntermute 13y ago
Yeah, I miss foobar2k too in Linux. I usually use Exaile.
- Sniffnoy 13y ago
  I just run foobar2k under Wine. It works pretty well.
  - rmk2 13y ago
    It has been named in this thread before, but you might not have seen it. I used to run foobar under wine, but honestly, deadbeef[1] works better from an integration point of view (global shortcuts, GTK etc.). [1] http://deadbeef.sourceforge.net/ http://deadbeef.sourceforge.net/
    - w1ntermute 13y ago
      Never heard of deadbeef, but it looks promising. I'll have to give it a shot.
    - Sniffnoy 13y ago
      This looks interesting. I'll have to check it out, thanks.