3 ms·
I agree that it's important to note that, since it makes one take the article with a grain of salt. Of course it is unacceptable for China (and anyone else) to
by malvim 17y ago
I agree that it's important to note that, since it makes one take the article with a grain of salt.
Of course it is unacceptable for China (and anyone else) to "push its weight around" when it comes to dealing with (so-called) "weaker" countries, but this affirmation sounds fairly hypocritical when coming from someone that lives in a country that never had a problem in pushing its own agenda as well.
- anamax 17y ago> Of course it is unacceptable for China (and anyone else) to "push its weight around" when it comes to dealing with (so-called) "weaker" countries Was it "unacceptable" to stop Nazi Germany from running concentration camps? > this affirmation sounds fairly hypocritical when coming from someone that lives in a country that never had a problem in pushing its own agenda as well. I'd much rather be "pushed around" by 1850s England than 1950s USSR, let alone late 1930s Germany.
- davidw 17y ago> Nazis DING DING DING - Godwin's law. This whole article is blatantly off topic in any case.
- catz 17y ago> I'd much rather be "pushed around" by 1850s England than 1950s USSR... let alone late 1930s Germany. Really? So you say that British impearialism is all right then? The English was the first group to perfect the concentration camp (which was used on my people). There is really no difference between British impearialism and the expansion of the USSR.