I think the point of this (terrible) question is to show the degree to which you play "the game." Possible outcomes: You state a real detrimental flaw -> Empl

I think the point of this (terrible) question is to show the degree to which you play "the game." Possible outcomes: You state a real detrimental flaw -> Employer wins by not hiring you and avoiding the consequences of the flaw. You have also demonstrated an inability to think on your feet or plan ahead by prepping for gotcha questions. You state a real flaw that is not detrimental to the job -> You have shown you are suited for the job, but not smart enough to play the game (employee but not management material). You name a strength -> You have demonstrated that you are willing to gloss over the truth when it is against your interests. You have demonstrated management potential!