3 ms·
It's good and useful for independent researchers to collect their own data and analyse it. That's a check on the data collection methods. It's also useful for
by J_Thomas 13y ago
It's good and useful for independent researchers to collect their own data and analyse it. That's a check on the data collection methods.
It's also useful for others to check the analysis of trusted data. If they do it with their own methods and get a different result, then it's time to actually compare the methods.
It's a good thing for the original researchers to release their code too. But looking for bugs in the code is no substitute for doing independent analysis and independent data collection. It's an important supplement, but it isn't enough.
- Blahah 13y agoI agree with your points. The saving in the case of released source code is that, if the original analysis is flawed in such a way that there's no need to repeat it because it's wrong, then a large amount of expense and effort can be saved. Of course, if the original analysis holds up given the data and code, independent replication is a necessary thing.