5 ms·
“We think you’d also like…” and the Math of Suggestion - Part 2
- wheels 18y agoThis is the continuation from here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=548584 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=548584 http://www.gruenderszene.de/it/we-think-youd-also-like-and-the-math-of-suggestion-–-teil-1/ http://www.gruenderszene.de/it/we-think-youd-also-like-and-t... As noted in the last round, this is a pretty light introduction to recommendations targeted mostly at only moderately technical folks (the audience of the blog that published it).
- sgrove 18y agoIt's a well written, if short, piece. I've never thought of recommendation systems as fun, but I feel like trying out some basic stuff with it now. Anyone know a good way to get started - especially simple test data?
- wheels 18y agoIf you just want data sets drop me a line, though most of the ones we test with are probably prohibitively large for just playing around with (millions of links / ratings). O'Reilly's Programming Collective Intelligence gives some decent background information, but in my opinion doesn't really cover enough to build a real system. A couple papers I often suggest with a lot of practical content are: Toward the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1070751 http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1070751 That one's fairly readable for people outside of the field. The Google News paper, which has some insights on doing large scale recommendations on a fairly dense user to item matrix, is a little more jumping into the deep end, but is worth glancing at even just to follow the references it sites: Google News Personalization: Scalable Online Collaborative Filtering http://www2007.org/papers/paper570.pdf http://www2007.org/papers/paper570.pdf (The paper itself doesn't mention being problematic on sparse rating sets, but I've implemented something very similar and found that to be the case.)