Without a mapping of a company's score to its value, these ratings are non-sensical. Considering probably only public data is the input and the actual function

Without a mapping of a company's score to its value, these ratings are non-sensical. Considering probably only public data is the input and the actual function isn't open, there is great reason to doubt the rating. I've made a similar exploration of W13. My scoring is my personal biased judgement. The whole effort isn't to get a US News Top 100 list, but to better understand the rating system itself. http://blog.kirigin.com/angel http://blog.kirigin.com/angel A simple thought experiment: how is this different from a random ranking? How would you know?