> Fundamentally, people like copying things, and some forms of copying are restricted by law. So either the law is bad, or they are a bad person. This is possi

> Fundamentally, people like copying things, and some forms of copying are restricted by law. So either the law is bad, or they are a bad person. This is possibly the least nuanced way to express this. Good law isn't good if it isn't understood or if it's misunderstood. It may be either or both if people don't learn its history, purpose, and meaning. That isn't the law's fault; it's the people's. But it doesn't make the people bad, either. Accusing people of moral failings is not how you start a rational discussion.