3 ms·
Ignoring the self-involvement inherent in the article, if you want to contribute to something big (There's nothing wrong with wanting that sense of "I helped bu
by richo 13y ago
Ignoring the self-involvement inherent in the article, if you want to contribute to something big (There's nothing wrong with wanting that sense of "I helped build this"); go contribute to a big FOSS project!
Fix a bug in rails[1] or django[2] (Pretty sure I saw you're a python guy).
Fix some of the hilarious problems with Bower[3] (Saw some js too).
There's an entire world of awesome problems to solve. Go solve them.
[1]: https://github.com/rails/rails/issues https://github.com/rails/rails/issues
[2]: https://github.com/django/django/issues https://github.com/django/django/issues
[3]: https://github.com/twitter/bower/issues https://github.com/twitter/bower/issues
- stefantalpalaru 13y agoContributing to Django might not be a good idea: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5476431 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5476431
- richo 13y agoI see your point (and in my view- screw contributing if it means interacting with trac), but reading over that issue it does look like his patch wasn't backwards compatible. The issue was reopened 5 weeks ago so hopefully it resolves well :/