3 ms·
Companies used to hire and invest in training, many don't do that now. On the other end, there are a lot of tech workers that don't try and keep abreast of new
by jmspring 14y ago
Companies used to hire and invest in training, many don't do that now.
On the other end, there are a lot of tech workers that don't try and keep abreast of new technologies and build their skill set. Often life/work may not allow for it, but one should be able to find a few hours a week to explore something new.
Unfortunately, the middle of those two circles are the ones hardest hit re: STEM at the moment.
I, personally, believe that if we are going to incentivize STEM work visas, there should be a cost associated with the visas that goes into a pool/fund that pays for training for STEM candidates that are out of work. If you are importing labor, despite an existing pool, there should be a cost associated with it.
- jlgreco 14y agoI think what I am suggesting is that if the younger in-experienced STEM job candidates were not so experienced with modern tech, then companies would be more willing to invest in teaching older experienced STEM job candidates new technology.
- ArtB 14y agoAs one of those young people I can tell you that we lack the domain knowledge that the old dinosaurs who produce crap code have. Who is easier to bring up to speed is hard to say but I'd bet against us.