3 ms·

If I've understood this article correctly, the book can be summarized as: Feel free to multiply all the numbers in a recipe by a real number greater than zero.

• neilc 18y ago
  Yeah, that was exactly my reaction as well. Surely, there must be something more to it than that ... right?
• tptacek 18y ago
  No, you've missed the point of the book. It's not that you can scale recipes. It's that behind almost every recipe there's a very simple ratio; when you know the ratio and the technique to apply it, you can generate many other recipes yourself. Think of it as a compression scheme.
• dk 18y ago
  The point is that recipes obscure the fundamental relationships of ingredients. I thought his explanation was clear that the essence of bread is 5:3 flour to water, and that with this simple ratio you can walk into a kitchen and make bread -- and improvise from there -- all without the need for a recipe. He described in another post noticing new relationships between foods after reducing them to their essentials, that for instance "an angel food cake was simply meringue with flour folded in." I hope I don't sound like I'm shilling for Ruhlman. I'm an enthusiastic follower of his blog but I have not bought, much less read this book.