2 ms·
"Religion does have significant evidence" Faith does not have empirical evidence. It has philosophical arguments backing it. Religion would cease becoming supe
by illuminate 14y ago
"Religion does have significant evidence"
Faith does not have empirical evidence. It has philosophical arguments backing it. Religion would cease becoming supernatural otherwise. There's a reason why theology is a soft social science and not a physical science (no matter what the Discovery Institute may tell you.)
"Science is a fucking method, not some "whole". "
Science is both a reflection of our current understanding of reality and the method of how we refine our understanding of it.
"Pretending to be objective is self-delusion"
We are not objective creatures there is a vast difference between nature and those who ~practice~ science.
- saraid216 14y agoI'm just going to note that you're claiming that theology is a science and say that you're wrong. Here's a write-up on the problematic nature of the methodology you use: http://www.wideopenground.com/fundamentalism-and-foundationalism/ http://www.wideopenground.com/fundamentalism-and-foundationa...