2 ms·
I don't think that's a workable solution. The professionals had identified the brothers as suspects - but only as very probable suspects. They could still have
by ProblemFactory 13y ago
I don't think that's a workable solution.
The professionals had identified the brothers as suspects - but only as very probable suspects. They could still have been wrong. Publicly definitely clearing someone who might later turn out to be the actual bomber or an associate would have enormous political (and perhaps legal) consequences.
I believe that any form of crowdsourced investigation is reasonable only if there just isn't enough professional interest or resources to pursue a case. For example finding your stolen laptop. If there are thousands of FBI agents working on a priority case, with additional private data feeds from security cameras, telephone logs and wiretaps, public "help" is of no use beyond stroking the ego of the participants.