> I very much doubt that this is true. Regardless of whether it is true or not, both drain the battery. Flash probably does drain it faster, but I'm only talki

> I very much doubt that this is true. Regardless of whether it is true or not, both drain the battery. Flash probably does drain it faster, but I'm only talking from a user perspective. I will watch about five minutes of video online a day, on average. The difference isn't noticeable for my use case, and probably not for most other peoples. > Why? I think at this point history has shown that those publicly stated reasons were entirely valid. No one said they weren't. What I'm saying is that it is likely that there are other reasons for Apple not wanting Flash on their system. > Efforts to make Flash run efficiently on tablets and smartphones failed, despite energetic attempts to do so. What efforts? > Evidence tends to support the view that Flash failed on mobile on its own shortcomings. Again, no one has said anything different. I'm saying that Flash works well on the Galaxy Nexus, and as a result will probably work fine on the iPhone if Apple wanted Flash on its system.