Alas, article does not explain where the betrayal is. Or even what the author considers "web". Someone is too self-centric and has no idea what an average web u

Alas, article does not explain where the betrayal is. Or even what the author considers "web". Someone is too self-centric and has no idea what an average web user is and what he wants. Honestly, rants like this sound a lot like "allowing same-sex marriages will destroy the sanctity of marriage" and alike. How exactly? Will the ability to have DRM'ed content in HTML suddenly shut down "the open web"? No.