3 ms·
The difference though is Glass being real-time. Imagine Glass being used by a golfer. No need for a golf tracker device. You can easily see how far you are fro
by dannyr 14y ago
The difference though is Glass being real-time.
Imagine Glass being used by a golfer. No need for a golf tracker device. You can easily see how far you are from the hole, wind speed, etc.
Imagine Glass being outfitted into the helmet. Watching football will not be the same. Seeing the perspective of the quarterback when he is about to throw the ball makes watching the sport more exciting.
- Samuel_Michon 14y agoThere are, and have been, more suitable products for that. I don’t think this is the use case Google has in mind for Glass. Google Glass is meant to be way more personal, collecting your movements and augmenting your physical world with content that Google has selected for you based on the information they have on you.
- dannyr 14y agoActually, it's more of sharing. Look at the promotional videos. Even the Google IO demo last year. It's sharing what the wearer sees to his circle or to the public. Of the main menu choices in Glass, 3 are for sharing "Photo, Video and Hangout"