3 ms·
That's because the cost of borrowing money is a lot cheaper than the tax hit that the company will incur if they repatriated cash back to the US. In most cases
by sinnerswing 13y ago
That's because the cost of borrowing money is a lot cheaper than the tax hit that the company will incur if they repatriated cash back to the US. In most cases the tax rate is as high as 35%[1]. Microsoft, for example, reported that it would owe $19.4 billion if it repatriated its $60.8 billion in offshore holdings[2]. using the same numbers, Apple will have to pay $35 billion in taxes if they repatriated $100 billion in offshore profits earned (and already taxed) in foreign countries.
[1]http://appleinsider.com/articles/11/02/16/apple_lobbies_for_offshore_tax_holiday_to_bring_cash_to_us http://appleinsider.com/articles/11/02/16/apple_lobbies_for_...
[2]http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-08/offshore-cash-hoard-expands-by-183-billion-at-companies.html http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-08/offshore-cash-hoard...
Companies do this all the time.
"Google Borrowing $3 Billion In First Ever Bond Offer"
http://www.businessinsider.com/google-bond-offering-2011-5 http://www.businessinsider.com/google-bond-offering-2011-5