3 ms·
Their resource estimator starts off at 1640 cores [1] and even the bottom most tick on the scale represents 500 cores. For people who can dedicate that amount o
by vosper 14y ago
Their resource estimator starts off at 1640 cores [1] and even the bottom most tick on the scale represents 500 cores. For people who can dedicate that amount of hardware to their database the licensing cost is probably not a major component.
The numbers look impressive, though.
http://www.memsql.com/why-memsql#scale-out http://www.memsql.com/why-memsql#scale-out
- jufo 14y agoTry again - I found the bottom ticks were 8 cores and 256GB.
- vosper 14y agoFair enough - I had considered that to be on the axis since it's the minimum value, and thus not a tick, but visually it certainly is represented as a tick. At any rate, the point I was trying to make is that they clearly expect you to throw a lot of hardware at these systems.
- SomeCallMeTim 14y agoSure, but a lot of projects LIKE this have an open source project for those people NOT in the enterprise, and who probably won't be running more than 8-24 cores or so. On a related note, changing the amount of RAM seems to only change the amount of RAM, not any of the other numbers. I guess that's their point, but I would rather they just SAY that than make me try a bunch of options to show that RAM doesn't matter. :|