4 ms·
Why did Datadial then remove the link in the original article if believed they are irrefutably right? The jurisdiction is not even the litigant-friendly US, it
by drucken 14y ago
Why did Datadial then remove the link in the original article if believed they are irrefutably right?
The jurisdiction is not even the litigant-friendly US, it is the UK...
- DanBC 14y ago> The jurisdiction is not even the litigant-friendly US, it is the UK... There was a case about 'deep linking' (and maybe framing?) from the early www. One Scottish news paper was linking to another Scottish newspaper. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deeplinking#Court_rulings https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deeplinking#Court_rulings)