3 ms·
> Most brand loyalty is even sillier. This makes no sense to me. If I have a good experience with a company, then any subsequent experience is far more likely
by maratd 14y ago
> Most brand loyalty is even sillier.
This makes no sense to me. If I have a good experience with a company, then any subsequent experience is far more likely to be good than a random selection?
The entire point behind brands is consistent experience.
- UVB-76 14y agoIf we're being pedantic, that's inductive reasoning. See the problem of induction [1]; you cannot justify any inference about future experiences of a product based on past experiences of it alone. Brand loyalty is broader and can potentially be justified. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_induction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_induction
- eru 14y agoInduction works mostly fine in practice.
- andrewflnr 14y agoIt mostly doesn't result in catastrophe. That doesn't mean it produces optimal results.