4 ms·
You may be right. At that time we will end up introducing or requiring some kind of horrible port multiplexing scheme, like maybe port knocking (using a patter
by apenwarr 14y ago
You may be right. At that time we will end up introducing or requiring some kind of horrible port multiplexing scheme, like maybe port knocking (using a pattern advertised in DNS) or maybe even... HTTP/1.1's Host: header :)
Separately, I think addresses are slightly different than those other measurements. I'd think the number of needed public server ip:port addresses is roughly on the same order of magnitude as the number of humans, or perhaps less. By that measurement, 4 billion is almost enough, but clearly not enough.
I wouldn't want to have to bet on that, but I don't have to. There's always another layer of indirection possible. And that layer of indirection will always be infinitely easier to deploy than a replacement to IPv4.