4 ms·
> Why burden yourself with such a bulky device, not to mention the cost of it, when your good old phone can take just as good photos. This is false. Any DSLR c
by _pferreir_ 14y ago
> Why burden yourself with such a bulky device, not to mention the cost of it, when your good old phone can take just as good photos.
This is false. Any DSLR can do better than the author's examples. These are not "nice photos", I am sorry. I would be hypocritical if I said otherwise.
OK, I get it, you can take pretty nice shots with your phone, but you cannot compare it to what a DSLR can provide. Not to mention that DSLRs let you tune several parameters that can make all the difference.
- sitharus 14y agoI'd have to agree, the photos all looked undersaturated and flat. Good enough for your average holiday snap I suppose, but nothing compared to what a good photographer can get with a DSLR.
- fudged71 14y agoA good photographer can do amazing work with whichever camera they are given, under the right circumstances (in the following case, a fully controlled studio fashion shoot) http://fstoppers.com/iphone http://fstoppers.com/iphone
- nemo 14y agoI'd say that the photos were nice. Not great, not outstanding, not attention grabbing, not technically excellent, but nice. Phones are fine for getting photos that are good enough, and if that's all you want buying equipment that's expensive and has a learning curve might not be for you. But if you do use the more expensive equipment and learn to use it you can produce some outstanding, attention grabbing, technically excellent photography. It's all about what your goals are and using the right tool for the goal.