3 ms·

>Also, HDR is so 2007, natural photos are where its at. The whole point of HDR is to create a natural image with natural colors.

• dllu 14y ago
  It's too bad that many neophytes of photography tend to use the HDR term for oversaturated and exaggerated pictures that were probably not taken with multiple exposures to begin with.
  • mortenjorck 14y ago
    HDR is, in effect, like Auto-Tune. Used as it was intended, it can improve your results, but with the correction turned up beyond a natural degree, can give a highly artificial effect of its own (which has been overused).
    • ycombobreaker 14y ago
      > HDR is, in effect, like Auto-Tune The difference between these two is that HDR is a technique designed to work around the limitations of the transfer medium: our eyes perceive more dynamic range than our cameras. Properly-done HDR should be closer to reality than the LDR image. Auto-Tune, OTOH, is creating a new effect, "fixing" the original singing. The recording fidelity itself is plenty high enough. Binaural recording is similar to HDR, too. Used properly, it will produce a stereo effect which should match what a local (human) listener would have heard. Used improperly, it's just stereo recordings.