> The study is not impressive. Most studies aren't, and exploratory, early-stage studies rarely can be. Yes, but a longitudinal examination of psychology publi

> The study is not impressive. Most studies aren't, and exploratory, early-stage studies rarely can be. Yes, but a longitudinal examination of psychology publications shows that, compared to mainstream science, psychology studies are rarely anything but "early-stage studies". Almost none of them is ever successfully replicated, nor is an effort made to replicate them, compared to other fields. > I certainly wouldn't start invoking morality, judgment, or other abstractions of the human psyche (as did the author of this article) from such a small and contrived set of experiments. I of course agree, but then it's a psychology study, where such hand-waving claims are commonplace.